Image Credit: Shutterstock
Key Takeaways
- Bain projects incumbent banks’ financial services revenue share will fall from 80% today to 69% by 2030.
- Executives are split on whether stablecoin wallets will replace bank accounts entirely or become a new layer on top of the existing system.
- Recent security incidents at Resolv and StablR highlight risks embedded in stablecoin infrastructure even as wallet adoption grows.
Traditional bank accounts are not disappearing, but their position as the default place consumers hold and move money is under growing pressure from stablecoins and digital wallets, according to a report from consulting firm Bain.
The report forecasts that incumbent banks’ share of financial services revenue will fall from 80% today to 69% by 2030. Industry executives are split on whether stablecoin wallets will replace bank accounts outright or simply push banks to rebuild around the same rails.
Bain Report Points To Shrinking Bank Revenue Share
Bain’s data shows a decades-long decline already underway. Incumbent banks captured 95% of financial services revenue in the early 2000s, a share the firm’s report says has eroded steadily as new entrants have chipped away at specific parts of the business.
Neobanks have challenged that position since the first ones emerged in 2009, offering digital-only alternatives to branch banking.
Stablecoin wallets now sit at the center of the same competitive pressure, according to the report, because they let users hold digital dollars, move money around the clock, and transact across borders without relying on traditional account and routing numbers.
The unresolved question the report raises is not whether stablecoins gain users, but whether they replace the bank account entirely or become a new layer that operates on top of the existing banking system.
Executives Argue Stablecoins Offer A Structural Advantage
Some industry executives argue the shift favors stablecoins decisively. Ryne Saxe, CEO of crypto wallet company Eco, framed the shift as close to inevitable:
“The endgame is clear: one simple balance that’s always earning, with universal addresses, no more account and routing numbers, and passkey-style login. Stablecoins are just better money. To attract users and be competitive, banks and fintechs have no choice but to build on stablecoin rails.”
Adrian Cachinero, co-founder of decentralized finance firm Steakhouse Financial, has separately said bank accounts face a genuine existential threat, adding that younger generations may grow up without ever needing to open one.
That view treats the competition less as a feature race and more as a question of whether the traditional account survives at all.
Payments Seen As The First Battleground
Other executives see the disruption as more targeted, starting with payments rather than the full range of banking services. Marcin Kazmierczak, co-founder of blockchain oracle network RedStone, said the effect is already visible in cross-border transfers:
“A bank account bundles three things: payments, savings and credit. Stablecoin wallets have already won payments in high-friction corridors. Banks risk owning the license while wallets own the customer relationship.”
Kazmierczak cited World Bank data putting the average cost of bank remittances at 14.99%, compared with a global average of 6.36% across all remittance methods. Stablecoin transactions, he said, can settle in seconds for less than 1%.
That cost gap is central to arguments that wallets will win payments first even if banks retain other functions.
Banks Expected To Adapt Rather Than Disappear
A separate group of executives argues the wallet does not necessarily mean self-custody or a bank-free system.
Ran Goldi, senior vice president of payments at Fireblocks, said he expects banks to issue tokenized deposits interoperable with stablecoins rather than cede the account relationship outright, describing the likely outcome as the bank account becoming programmable rather than stablecoins simply winning.
Alvin Kan, chief operating officer at Bitget Wallet, said the account itself is becoming more open and portable, with users increasingly able to hold digital dollars that move across borders, platforms and applications in real time rather than staying confined to one institution.
Data from payments firm BVNK shows 77% of crypto users would open a stablecoin wallet through their existing bank or fintech rather than manage one independently. This is a preference that supports the case for banks retaining the customer relationship even as the underlying rails shift.
Jody Mettler, chief operating officer at BitGo and president of BitGo Bank and Trust, argued banks continue to provide functions wallets do not replace, including custody, compliance, and consumer protection:
“Stablecoin wallets function natively inside 24/7 digital rails. The bank account doesn’t vanish. It compiles to code.”
Security Incidents Underscore The Risks
The debate over stablecoin infrastructure comes alongside recent reminders of the risks embedded in the tokens themselves. Resolv’s USR stablecoin fell about 70% in March after an attacker minted unbacked tokens and extracted $25 million from the protocol.
StablR disclosed unauthorized issuance of its USDR and EURR tokens in May following a separate security breach.
Those incidents do not resolve the broader debate over whether stablecoins replace bank accounts, but they illustrate why several executives argue that banks’ compliance and consumer-protection functions remain relevant even as payment volume shifts toward digital wallets.
Consumers may increasingly interact with their money through wallets, while regulated institutions continue to hold the underlying funds and absorb the associated risks.
