Image Credit: cyberleek.com
Key Takeaways
- CYBERLEEK’s main Raydium pool existed before the first verified GTA 6-linked promotion.
- Leak-linked promotion coincided with substantial trading, but CYBERLEEK has fallen more than 50% from its peak.
- Burned supply and locked liquidity reduce some structural risks but do not establish durable demand.
CYBERLEEK existed before the earliest GTA 6-linked promotion identified in this review, but trading accelerated as leaked footage became tied to market-cap milestones. By Aug. 26, the token was about 50% below its Aug. 23 peak, leaving high turnover but comparatively limited liquidity.
At 05:21 UTC on Aug. 26, DEX Screener showed the main CYBERLEEK/SOL Raydium pool associated with mint ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg at about $0.01716. Market capitalization was $12.5 million, liquidity $1.6 million and 24-hour volume $11.3 million. The pool was initialized on Aug. 15 at 21:07:26 UTC, roughly three days before the earliest promotion identified in this review.
Leaked Footage Became Part of the Token Campaign
Apparent videos of GTA VI have recently circulated online under the CyberLeek name. An archived Aug. 18 post included the exact CYBERLEEK mint and told viewers to “BUY” alongside “GTA 6 LEAK V3,” making it the earliest documented GTA 6-linked promotion identified by CoinInsider.
The campaign later connected additional footage more directly to the token. An Aug. 21 video displayed “HIGHER MARKETCAP = MORE LEEKS,” while a later clip tied a $3 million market-cap threshold to strip-club footage. The messages linked further releases of allegedly unauthorized material to token milestones.
Z1G has separately examined GTA 6 leaks and Take-Two’s investigation. Take-Two requested court approval to subpoena Microsoft and Discord for information identifying alleged infringers, and those requests were approved on Aug. 21. That does not establish that the anonymous CyberLeek identity was the original hacker or source.
Trading Peaked Before a 50% Retracement
The available snapshots show trading activity rising sharply during the promotional period. CoinGecko-sourced data showed about $2.45 million in 24-hour volume at 06:44 UTC on Aug. 21. By 01:52 UTC on Aug. 24, the main Raydium pair alone was showing about $39.3 million in 24-hour volume.
CoinGecko records an all-time high of $0.03436079 on Aug. 23. Against the Aug. 26 DEX price of $0.01716, CYBERLEEK had retraced about 50.1%. The timing supports correlation between the promotional cycle and heavier trading, but it does not establish that any individual post caused the move.
Liquidity also shows the difference between trading turnover and market depth. The $1.6 million liquidity snapshot equaled about 12.8% of the $12.5 million market capitalization, while 24-hour trading volume was roughly seven times available liquidity.
Token Supply Was Reduced and Minting Disabled
On-chain records show an original supply of one billion CYBERLEEK. Before pool creation, 730 million tokens were deposited into Raydium and 270 million were sent to another address. On Aug. 22, that address used the SPL Token burnChecked instruction to destroy the 270 million balance, leaving live supply around 729.99 million.
The mint uses nine decimals, while its mint and freeze authorities are null. Under the standard SPL mechanism, that prevents additional CYBERLEEK from being minted and token accounts from being frozen through those authorities. These controls reduce two structural risks but do not limit secondary-market selling.
Most Liquidity Was Locked Through Raydium
The main market is a Raydium constant-product market maker, or CPMM, pool. On Aug. 15, the pool creator placed 490,815.65 LP tokens into Raydium’s Burn & Earn mechanism. An Aug. 23 snapshot calculated that position at about 98.43% of live LP supply.
Burn & Earn makes the underlying LP tokens that are not withdrawable, although a transferable Fee Key retains rights to trading fees from the locked position. The lock limits withdrawal of the original Raydium liquidity, but it does not guarantee price stability or continued demand.
Holder analysis requires similar care. Among the top 30 holders in the Aug. 23 snapshot, 14 addresses whose first decoded CYBERLEEK receipt occurred before an Aug. 22 18:00 UTC cutoff held about 9.2% of supply. Infrastructure addresses such as the Raydium vault and DFlow custody were excluded, while separate wallets cannot be assumed to represent separate owners.
Durable Demand Has Not Been Established
CYBERLEEK is not affiliated with or endorsed by Rockstar Games or Take-Two Interactive. Even apparently authentic leaked footage would not make the token official, safe or commercially connected to GTA 6.
The market has shown that leak-linked promotion can coincide with substantial turnover, but peak capitalization alone does not establish durability. The next tests are whether liquidity and volume remain after promotional posts and footage incentives slow, whether major holders materially change positions, and whether trading persists without new token-linked leaks. Those measures would better distinguish a temporary attention trade from a market capable of maintaining activity independently of the campaign.
