Computer screen showing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission website header and logo in a web browser.
LAWS

SEC Staff Says Token Buybacks Alone Don’t Create Investment Contracts

Image credit: Shutterstock

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission staff says a token buyback announcement does not amount to a promise of essential managerial efforts when the underlying crypto system is already functional. The guidance applies to non-security crypto assets and does not provide blanket clearance for every token repurchase program. The Division of Corporation Finance published the clarification in crypto FAQs issued Sept. 25.

Buyback Treatment Depends on Network Functionality

SEC staff identified treasury management, supply reduction, protocol-funded burns and rebalancing as examples of reasons an issuer might conduct a buyback. For a functional crypto system, announcing a buyback of a non-security crypto asset would not constitute a promise to undertake the essential managerial efforts considered under the Howey test.

“Where a crypto system is functional, an issuer’s announcement of a non-security crypto asset buyback program would not constitute a representation or promise to undertake essential managerial efforts.”

Unfinished Networks Face Different Treatment

The analysis can change when a crypto system is not yet functional. SEC staff said a buyback announcement could represent essential managerial efforts if an issuer presents the program as creating yield or returns for token holders. The guidance therefore does not mean token buybacks automatically prevent a transaction from falling under federal securities laws.

Network Maintenance May Not Satisfy Howey

The FAQs also address development after a network becomes functional. Staff said activities that secure, maintain, improve or enhance a functional crypto system, by themselves, generally would not constitute the essential managerial efforts considered under Howey. Promoting a network’s existing utility also generally would not constitute such a promise without additional facts.

Guidance Is Not an SEC Rule

The FAQs reflect the views of the Division of Corporation Finance rather than the Commission itself. The SEC states that the guidance has no legal force or effect, does not change existing law and creates no new obligations. It builds on the Commission’s March 2026 interpretive release covering certain crypto assets and transactions.

More For You

Explore More News